IPI International Potash Institute
IPI International Potash Institute

Research Findings: e-ifc No. 48, March 2017

Soybean harvest in Brazil. Photo by ICL Brazil

Introducing Polyhalite to Brazil: First Steps of a New Fertilizer

Vale, F.(1)*, and D.R. Sério(2)
print version pdf download pdf 2.78 MB

Abstract

(1)IPI Coordinator Latin America, International Potash Institute (IPI), Zug, Switzerland
(2)ICL, Agronomy Supervisor, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Corresponding author: fabio.vale@ipipotash.org

Being among the world’s leading agricultural producers, Brazil imports and uses huge amounts of fertilizer, yearly. High soil acidity, adverse side-effects of liming and poor soil fertility challenge the efficacy of conventional fertilizers. Alternative options are required to overcome poor potassium (K) recovery in the soil, deprived calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) mobility in the soil profile, and excess soil-chloride concentrations. Fertilizers also need to meet the crop demand for sulfate (SO42-); soil levels of which gradually decline over time to below critical levels. An examination of polyhalite, an evaporate mineral comprised of S, Ca, Mg, and K, has revealed equivalent effectiveness in supporting the nutrient requirements of rice when compared to corresponding soluble salts. In a soybean field test, polyhalite showed enhanced Ca and Mg mobility in the soil profile, as well as equivalent effectiveness as a K-donor compared to potassium chloride (KCl). This report discusses the potential of polyhalite to contribute to the Brazilian agricultural production.

Keywords: Acid soil; calcium; chloride; magnesium; potassium; soybean; sulfur.

Introduction

Due to continued population growth, worldwide demands for food, fibers, and energy are rapidly increasing. Therefore, agricultural resources, namely water and soil, must be rationally and carefully managed. In order to maintain or even increase the productivity of existing arable land, soil qualities should be preserved and enhanced through several elementary practices such as soil conservation management, soil amendment, crop rotation, use of crop varieties with high genetic potential, and efficient use of mineral fertilizers.

Brazil is among the leading producers of agricultural commodities (Table 1). In the recent decade (2006-2016), Brazilian agricultural production and export have displayed a consistent increasing trend, including for ‘new’ commodities such as wheat, potato, and peanut. This boost in production has resulted in increased fertilizer requirements. Consequently, the amount of fertilizer delivered to farmers in Brazil in 2015 reached 30.2 million tons, of which the share of potash fertilizer was considerably high at 29.2%. This figure indicates the significance of potassium (K) to crop production, but also raises questions regarding the efficacy of the common potash fertilizer, potassium chloride (KCl), when applied to most soils in Brazil.

                 
  Table 1. Agricultural production in Brazil in recent years (Data extracted from: http://www.indexmundi.com/agriculture/).  
  Commodity World ranking Production Export   Harvested area Year  
    1,000 MT   1,000 ha  
  Soybean oilseeds 1 102,000 58,400   33,800 2016  
  Green coffee 1 3,357 2,120   1,896 2017  
  Orange juice 1 885 885   480 2016  
  Sugarcane 1 739,300 24,350   9,080 2016  
  Corn 3 83,500 25,500   16,400 2016  
  Cotton 6 3,500 1,400   930 2016  
  Wheat 17 6,340 1,500   2,100 2016  
  Potato 21 3,935 -   131 2016  
  Peanut oilseeds 26 425 180   123 2016  
                 

KCl (or muriate of potash) dominates the Brazilian potash fertilizer market (ANDA, 2016) however, local KCl production comprises less than 6% of total consumption and the rest is imported. In 2015, the share of potash fertilizers other than KCl imported to Brazil was only 1%. Such alternative K sources include mainly potassium sulfate (K2SO4) and potassium magnesium sulfate (K-Mg-S) (SIACESP, 2016).

Potash fertilizers, other than KCl, are advantageous due to the absence of chlorine (Cl), which is suspected to negatively affect produce quality of important crops such as tobacco, potatoes, and pineapples. Furthermore, these alternative fertilizers provide additional nutrients such as sulfur (S), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) which are important to the nutritional balance of crops (Malavolta, 1980). Nevertheless, the production costs of most Cl-free potash alternatives are significantly higher than that of KCl, therefore increasing economic constraints.

Polyhalite is one of a number of evaporate minerals containing K. Polyhalite (dehydrate) is a single crystal complex, the chemical formula of which is K2Ca2Mg(SO4)4•2(H2O), with a low impurity content (up to 5%), comprising mostly of sodium chloride. Polyhalite displays some slow-release characteristics, thus providing progressive nutrient availability to the soil. Evaluations carried out into soil columns by the University of Nottingham, UK, showed that 50-60% of polyhalite S was immediately available, while the remaining S was slowly released (Jiang et al., 2016). Polyhalite mined and manufactured in the UK (Cleveland Potash Ltd.) typically consists of 14% potassium oxide (K2O); 48% sulfur trioxide (SO3); 6% magnesium oxide (MgO); and 17% calcium oxide (CaO). As a fertilizer comprising four key plant nutrients - S, K, Mg, and Ca - polyhalite provides a new solution to crop nutrition.

Early studies confirmed polyhalite’s efficiency as a fertilizer. Polyhalite was equivalent to or better than sulfate of potash magnesia, and consistently better than KCl with or without Mg (Boratyński and Turyna, 1971). In a study by Barbarick (1989), the continuous cropping of sorghum-sudangrass in a greenhouse showed that polyhalite was as effective, or superior to, equivalent rates of soluble sources of K, Ca, Mg and S. More recent field studies demonstrated that polyhalite was as effective or better than gypsum for a number of cruciferous crops, such as rape oilseed in France (Dugast, 2015) and mustard (Tiwari et al., 2015), cabbage and cauliflower in India (Satisha and Ganeshamurthy, 2016). Sesame and peanut yield and quality were improved in India (Tiwari et al., 2015) and Vietnam (Tam et al., 2016), respectively. Tea (PVFCCo (a), 2016) and coffee (PVFCCo (b), 2016) crops grown on acid tropical soils in Vietnam were also found to benefit from the use of polyhalite as a slow-release, multi-nutrient donating fertilizer.

The potential of polyhalite fertilizer and its relevance to Brazilian agriculture have thus far been inadequately addressed. The objectives of the present study were to: 1) assess the agronomic effectiveness of polyhalite as a nutrient donor in potted rice plants grown on Oxisol; 2) evaluate Ca and Mg mobility in the soil profile with polyhalite as the K-donor for soybean growth on no-tillage Oxisol, and; 3) discuss the possible contribution of polyhalite to the nutritional solutions of important crops in Brazil.

        
 Table 2. Description of the treatments used in the potted rice experiment (after Vitti and Vale, 2013). 
 Treatment K2O S Ca Mg N + P2O5 +
micronutrients
 
  Doses equivalent to kg ha-1  
 1. Control----+ 
 2. No K, S, Ca, Mg----+ 
 3. Granular polyhalite (1 g pot-1)70966018+ 
 4. Soluble K, S, Ca, Mg salts70966018+ 
 5. Granular polyhalite (2 g pot-1)14019212036+ 
 6. Polyhalite powder (1 g pot-1) 70 96 60 18 +  
               

Materials and methods

Potted rice experiment

The study was carried out in 2013 in a greenhouse located at São Paulo University in Piracicaba, Brazil. Oxisol soil, which has a very low clay content (88; 83; 829 g kg-1 of clay, silt and sand, respectively) and low organic matter and micronutrients content, was put into 4 dm3 polyethylene pots. One month before fertilizer application, calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and magnesium carbonate (MgCO3) were added to raise soil base saturation (V%) to 50%. The trial was comprised of six treatments (Table 2) in four replications, in a completely randomized design.

Plants were harvested 78 days after fertilizer application, and the dry matter production and nutrient uptake were evaluated.

Table 3. Description of the soybean experiment evaluating nutrient mobility in the soil (after Vale, 2016).

Table 3. Description of the soybean experiment evaluating nutrient mobility in the soil (after Vale, 2016).
click to enlarge

Evaluating nutrient mobility in the soil

The on-field trial was located in Sapezal, Mato Grosso state, Brazil, on Oxisol with a medium clay content (143; 72; 785 g kg-1 of clay, silt, and sand, respectively), and employed a completely randomized design comprising two fertilization treatments - KCl and polyhalite (Table 3). A month before soybean sowing, dolomitic limestone (2.5 Mg ha-1) was applied and incorporated using a heavy harrow. On sowing, an onto furrow base fertilizer application of 200 kg ha-1 of mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP) was applied. KCl or polyhalite were then applied onto the top soil at V1 and V6 soybean developmental stages.

After harvest, the soil was sampled at the following depths: 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-30, and 30-40 cm, and analyzed for soil K, Ca, Mg and S contents.

Fig. 1. Development of rice plants applied with polyhalite fertilizer in comparison with plants lacking K2O, S, Ca and Mg (a), or with plants applied with soluble salts comprising equivalent nutrients (b).

Results

Potted rice experiment

Rice plants lacking the macronutrients K, S, Ca, and Mg displayed very poor development (Fig. 1). Soluble sources of these nutrients and granular or powder polyhalite application, enabled normal plant development.

Fig. 2. Effect of fertilizer treatments on rice dry matter production. Treatments: 1. Control; 2. Lack of K, S, Ca, and Mg; 3. Granular polyhalite (1 g pot-1); 4. Soluble K, S, Ca, and Mg salts; 5. Granular polyhalite (2 g pot-1); 6. Powder polyhalite (1 g pot-1). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at P=0.05 (Duncan test). A detailed description of the treatments is available in Table 2.

Fig. 2. Effect of fertilizer treatments on rice dry matter production. Treatments: 1. Control; 2. Lack of K, S, Ca, and Mg; 3. Granular polyhalite (1 g pot-1); 4. Soluble K, S, Ca, and Mg salts; 5. Granular polyhalite (2 g pot-1); 6. Powder polyhalite (1 g pot-1). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at P=0.05 (Duncan test). A detailed description of the treatments is available in Table 2.
click to enlarge

Both granular and powder polyhalite displayed a similar effectiveness in supplying plants with K2O, S, Ca, and Mg, when compared to soluble sources (Fig. 2). No toxicity or salinity problems occurred following normal or doubled polyhalite application.

Examinations of K, S, Ca, and Mg uptake in potted rice plants showed that the recovery of polyhalite-supplied K, S, and Mg was equal to that occurring in plants fertilized with the equivalent soluble sources (Fig. 3). Ca uptake by rice was significantly better under the soluble fertilizer, however, the availability of this nutrient from polyhalite was high and sufficient for normal plant development. Doubling the polyhalite dose resulted in a consequent increase in K uptake, a slight decrease in Ca uptake, and no response in rice S or Mg uptake (Fig. 3). These results, collated under greenhouse conditions, demonstrate the principal effectiveness of polyhalite as a fertilizer, even on low fertility soils.

Fig. 3. K, S, Ca, and Mg uptake by potted rice plants in response to fertilization treatments on Oxisol. Treatments: 1. control; 2. lack of K, S, Ca, and Mg; 3. granular polyhalite (1 g pot-1); 4. soluble K, S, Ca, and Mg salts; 5. granular polyhalite (2 g pot-1); 6. powder polyhalite (1 g pot-1). More details are provided in Table 2. Different letters indicate statistical significant differences at P=0.05 (Duncan test).

Evaluating nutrient mobility in the soil

Limestone, applied to reduce soil acidity, enriches the shallow soil layer into which it has been incorporated with Ca and Mg. In no-tillage systems, where limestone is broadcast onto the soil surface without incorporation into the soil, Ca and Mg are concentrated in the top soil. This restricts the root system to a shallow soil layer, increasing plant susceptibility to transient water shortages and to consequent yield reduction under unstable precipitation regimes. It was interesting to compare the distribution of K, S, Ca, and Mg in the soil profile of a soybean crop, following liming and fertilization treatments with KCl and polyhalite.

Limestone application increased Ca and Mg solely in the 0-10 cm layer, proportional to its mechanical incorporation. Compared to the KCl applied soil, polyhalite application resulted in a larger increase in Ca and Mg content throughout the soil profile; Ca content rose by 23% and 8% in the 0-20 and 20-40 cm layers, respectively, while the increments in Mg were of 25% and 17% for the same soil layers (Fig. 4).

Sulphate was the most mobile nutrient in the soil in both treatments, maintaining a narrow concentration range of 10-20 mg dm-3 throughout the examined soil layers (Fig. 4). While S contents were equal in the top soil layer, polyhalite significantly increased its concentrations in the deeper layers. In contrast, K content was significantly higher in the top soil, and markedly declined in soil layers deeper than 10 cm. No difference was observed in soil-K content between KCl and polyhalite applied soils (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Soybean soil profile contents of Ca, Mg, K, and S following liming and fertilization treatments with KCl or polyhalite on Oxisol soil.

Discussion

Polyhalite potential for Brazilian agriculture

Added to the arsenal of available fertilizer, polyhalite may provide several alternative solutions to some chronic nutrition problems associated with Brazilian agriculture.

In Brazil, the current (2016/17) area of soybean, corn, wheat, and cotton crops is over 55 million hectares (CONAB, 2016). It is estimated that more than 75% of this area is cultivated under a no-tillage system in which limestone is applied superficially, without incorporation into the subsurface layers. The efficiency of surface limestone application onto no-tillage soil, particularly in the correction of soil acidity, is controversial. Studies of Brazilian soils indicate little or no limestone mobility deeper than the top soil layer (Gonzales-Erico et al., 1979). Crops productivity under no-tillage systems is highly dependent on the fertility of a very shallow, 0-5 cm deep, soil layer, which is often characterized by a highly exchangeable Ca content base saturation, but also by high exchangeable toxic aluminum ions (Caires et al., 2000). An evaluation of soybean plant development in several regions of Brazil has revealed that high grain yields, above 4.5 Mg ha-1, are associated with prosperous root systems at depths below 40 cm. A thriving root system provides the plant with significantly greater access to deeper soil water and nutrient resources, thus supporting enhanced crop development and improved resistance to unfavorable weather conditions. However, such subsurface rooting is only possible with high soil fertility at a depth of 40-100 cm.

Calcium plays an important role in root growth and development. Deficiency in Ca supply at the root tip causes almost immediate disruption of its growth, followed by tissue blackening and cell death (Mengel and Kirkby, 2001). In addition, Ca is a virtually immobile element in the phloem (Marschner and Richter, 1974). Therefore, sufficient Ca availability at the root apex is crucial for crop development. Sako et al. (2015) found that an in-depth minimum threshold of 8 mmolc Ca dm-3 was required to allow the expression of high soybean productivity. The application of calcium sulfate (CaSO4), suggested as the solution for the fixation of limestone to the upper soil layer, has improved Ca movement to deeper layers (Ritchie et al., 1980). The soybean field trial presented here indicates that polyhalite has an adequate solubility to reach and promote the active crop rhizosphere when applied to the top soil (Fig. 4). Thus, polyhalite is a fertilizer with considerable potential to improve productivity of no-tillage systems, where soils exhibit significant Ca deficiency in the subsurface layers.

Soybean crop in Brazil. Photo by ICL Brazil.

Soybean crop in Brazil. Photo by ICL Brazil.
click to enlarge

Sulfur has essential functions in plant development and crop quality, from participation in amino acid and protein formation to hormonal control, photosynthesis and plant defense mechanisms against pathogens (Vitti et al., 2015). An evaluation of 8,500 soil samples in Brazil showed that 75% had low or very low S. The main causes of S deficiency in tropical soils are associated with the high mobility of the sulfate ion in the soil, and the low amounts of S often found in the soil profile explored by the roots when compared to the temperate regions (Vitti, 1989). There are several reasons for the recent decline in available soil S. After more than a century of heavy-polluting industries and transportation, worldwide awareness has enforced a significant decline in sulfur dioxide emissions. Subsequently, the phenomenon of acid rain has almost vanished and S supply to the vegetation through foliar or root absorption has rapidly declined (Scherer, 2001). In addition, the considerable increase in the use of S-free pesticides and fertilizer has contributed to S deficiency in soils. Soil amendment practices that are very common in tropical acid soils, such as liming and phosphating, alter the chemical interactions between soil particles, resulting in increased leaching of the sulfate ion (SO42-) and consequent soil S depletion (Kamprath and Till, 1983; Vitti et al., 2015). Thus, crop S requirements that were fully met in the past by undesired resources (pollution) are now, not being met. Among S fertilizers, polyhalite provides a potential solution to meet this demand.

Magnesium is frequently overlooked in plant nutrition and shortages adversely impact plant growth. Adequate Mg supplies are required for many essential plant functions, the most noticeable of which are root formation, chlorophyll build up, and photosynthesis. Also, many less observable biochemical reactions are dependent on an adequate supply of Mg (Cakmak and Yazici, 2010). In no-tillage systems, this nutrient tends to concentrate in the top soil, fixed in various forms of MgCO3, most of which are insoluble and immobile in the soil (Ritchey et al., 1980). Low Mg availability throughout the soil has become a problem in the nutrition of perennial crops, such as coffee and citrus. As a result of superficial limestone application, Mg concentrates in the shallow top soil layer, and its subsequent availability throughout the soil is very low. Under these conditions the soil’s content of exchangeable Mg is sufficient, but its concentration in the soil solution - the fraction absorbed by plant roots - is too low (Juo and Uzu, 1977). The application of sulfate of potash magnesia showed promising effects on orange productivity and fruit quality; favoring greater Mg uptake, the plant nutritional balance was improved and resulted in larger fruit with higher juice content and improved sugar to acid ratio (Vale, 2010). As shown above, polyhalite also provides a soluble Mg source, and should therefore be considered as an alternative fertilizer for perennial crops in Brazil.

The very low polyhalite Cl content makes it a suitable fertilizer choice for many fruit and vegetable crops that require high K doses on the one hand, and suffer from excess Cl in the rhizosphere on the other. Chloride is often related to a deprived rooting of annual plants such as corn, wheat, cotton, and soybeans, as well as to a reduced nodulation capacity in legumes where the biological N fixation is hampered. Chloride toxicity to soybean crops increases when it is accompanied by K+ (derived from KCl fertilizer), which particularly affects the reproductive phase and yield formation (Malavolta et al., 1980). The high salinity index value of KCl (116.3) indicates possible germination delays, slow emergence or even reduced crop stand resulting from the high KCl doses applied in the roots’ vicinity (Malavolta and Usherwood, 1982). Soybean crops cultivated on soils that frequently receive high KCl doses might exhibit severe toxicity symptoms due to accumulation of Cl and manganese, especially when droughts occur before flowering (Borkert et al., 1994).

Sugarcane crop in Brazil. Photo by F. Vale.

Sugarcane crop in Brazil. Photo by F. Vale.
click to enlarge

A cotton field towards harvest in Brazil. Photo by ICL Brazil.

A cotton field towards harvest in Brazil. Photo by ICL Brazil.
click to enlarge

Potato, a rising crop in Brazil, demands high K doses during tuber development. Potassium is essential for supporting carbohydrate production and translocation to the starchy tubers (Zörb et al., 2014), thus increasing their dry matter content. High dry matter content is a desired tuber quality trait, particularly when tubers are destined for processing (Reis Junior and Monnerat, 2001); it increases the palatability of French fries (potato chips), as they become crisper, tastier, and less oily (Zehler et al., 1981). Excessive KCl use rapidly supplies the potato crop with available K, however the substantial chloride amounts added to the system might reduce tuber dry matter content, especially where salinity problems develop (Imas and Bansal, 1999). Replacing KCl with Cl-free potash fertilizers such as K2SO4 or sulfate of potash magnesia, seemed a viable alternative for potato crop nutrition management, as it improves both productivity and tuber quality (Vale and Silva, 2009). In a similar way, replacing KCl with sulfate of potash magnesia improves the produce quality of coffee due to a significant decrease in the concentration of reducing sugars in the beans (Silva et al., 1999). Thus, polyhalite should be considered for crop nutrition where KCl or other Cl-rich fertilizers are unfavorable.

Concluding remarks

The results of the potted rice experiment provide convincing evidence that polyhalite, a natural complex mineral, is an effective fertilizer in supplying Ca, Mg, S, and K on Oxisol - a low nutrient sandy soil. Polyhalite was equal in supporting plant growth, development and nutrient uptake to the corresponding soluble salts (Fig 1, Fig 2 and Fig 3). Consequently, the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture authorized the use of polyhalite as an agricultural fertilizer in 2015.

The soybean field trial presented here suggests that polyhalite has adequate solubility to reach and promote an active crop rhizosphere when applied to the top soil layer (Fig. 4). Thus, polyhalite is a fertilizer with considerable potential to improve production within no-tillage systems, where soils exhibit significant Ca and Mg deficiency in the subsurface layers. Moreover, polyhalite emerges as a relevant K fertilizer, with equal efficiency to KCl and without the adverse effects of chloride, making it more suitable for use on certain soils and for certain crop species. Yet, the major advantage of polyhalite is in the delivery of S, an essential nutrient which until recently, has often been overlooked. Brazil’s leading crops - sugarcane (Oliveira, 2011), soybean (Gutierrez Boem et al., 2007), corn (Ciampitti et al., 2013), and cotton (Reiter, 2013) - require significant S inputs, as do other important crops including wheat (Zhao et al., 1999) and peanut (Tam et al., 2016). In accordance, new field trials have recently been launched in Brazil for soybean, corn, cotton, sugarcane, coffee, orange, banana, onion, cabbage, and potato crops, with the purpose of consolidating the potential of polyhalite as an important fertilizer for Brazilian crops.

References

  • ANDA, Brazilian National Fertilizer Association. 2016. Available at http://www.anda.org.br. Accessed in: 29/11/2016.
  • Barbarick, K.A. 1989. Polyhalite as a Potassium Fertilizer. Colorado State University, Agricultural Station. Technical Bulletin TB89-2.
  • Boratyński, K., and Z. Turyna. 1971. Fertilizing Value of Polyhalite in the Light of Pot Experiments. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych. 97:67-83.
  • Borkert, C.M., J.T. Yorinori, B.S. Correa-Ferreira, A.M.R. Almeida, L.P. Ferreira, and G.J. Sfredo. 1994. Seja o doutor da sua soja. Informacoes Agronomicas, Piracicaba, n. 66, p. 1-16, jun. 1994. Arquivo do Agronomo, n. 5.
  • Caires, E.F., D.A. Banzatt, and A.F. Fonseca. 2000. Surface Application of Lime under a No-Tillage System. Rev. Bras. Ci. Solo 24:161-169.
  • Cakmak, I., and M. Yazici. 2010. Magnesium: A Forgotten Element in Crop Production. Better Crops 94:23-25.
  • Ciampitti, I.A., J.J. Camberato, S.T. Murrell, and T.J. Vyn. 2013. Maize Nutrient Accumulation and Partitioning in Response to Plant Density and Nitrogen Rate: I. Macronutrients. Agron. J. 105:783-795.
  • CONAB. 2016. Follow-Up of the Brazilian Grain Crop, v.4, Crop 2016/17 - Second survey, Brasília, November 2016, 156 p.
  • Dugast, P. 2015. Use of Polyhalite as a Source of Sulfur for Oilseed Rape and Winter Wheat in France. IPI e-ifc 43:21-26.
  • Gonzales-Erico, E., E.J. Kamprath, G.C. Nadermann, and W.V. Soares. 1979. Effect of Depth of Lime Incorporation on the Growth of Corn on an Oxisol of Central Brazil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43:1155-1158.
  • Gutierrez Boem, F.H., P. Prystupa, and G. Ferraris. 2007. Seed Number and Yield Determination in Sulfur Deficient Soybean Crops. J. Plant Nutr. 30:93-104.
  • Imas, P., and S.K. Bansal. 1999. Potassium and Integrated Nutrient Management in Potato. In: Global Conference on Potato Vol. 611.
  • Jiang, L., S.D. Young, M.R. Broadley, E.H. Bailey, N.S. Graham, and S.P. McGrath. 2016. Dissolution Rate of Selected Sulphur Fertilizers; Understanding Selenate - Sulphate Competition. In: Royal Society of Chemistry, 16. London, UK: University of Nottingham.
  • Juo, A.S.R, and F.O. Uzu. 1977. Liming and Nutrient Interactions in two Ultisols from Southern Nigeria. Plant and Soil 47:419-430.
  • Kamprath, E.J., and A.R. Till. 1938. Sulfur Cycling in the Tropics. In: Blair, G.J., and A.R. Till (ed.). Sulfur in S.E. Asian and S. Pacif Agriculture. Indonesia: Univ. New England. p. 1-14.
  • Malavolta, E. 1980. Elementos de nutrição mineral de plantas. Sao Paulo, Agronômica Ceres. p. 170-202.
  • Malavolta, E., F.M. Freire, J.C. Casagrande, L.I. Nakayama, I. Eimori, and J.A.B. Castillo. 1980. Studies on the Effect of Levels of Chloride on Soybean Plants Grown in Nutrient Solution: I. Growth and Yield. An. Esc. Super. Agric. Luiz de Queiroz 37:763-774.
  • Malavolta, E., and N.R. Usherwood. 1982. Adubos e adubação potássica. Piracicaba: POTAFOS. 56 p. (POTAFOS. Boletim Técnico, 3).
  • Marschner, H., and C. Richter. 1974. Calcium Translocation in Roots of Maize and Bean Seedlings. Plant and Soil 40:193-210.
  • Mengel, K., and E.A. Kirkby. 2001. Principle of Plant Nutrition. 5th Edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Oliveira, E.C.A. 2011. Balanço nutricional da cana-de-açucar relacionado à adubação nitrogenada. Doctoral Thesis, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba. DOI: 10.11606/T.11.2011.tde-20042011-094249.
  • Petro Vietnam Fertilizer and Chemicals Corporation (PVFCCo) (a). 2016. Polyhalite Application Improves Tea (Camillia sinensis) Yield and Quality in Vietnam. IPI e-ifc 46:22-29.
  • Petro Vietnam Fertilizer and Chemicals Corporation (PVFCCo) (b). 2016. Polyhalite Application Improves Coffee (Coffea robusta) Yield and Quality in Vietnam. IPI e-ifc 47:12-19.
  • Reis Júnior, R.A., and P.H. Monnerat. 2001. Nutrient Removal by Potato Tubers in Response to Potassium Sulphate Applications. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília 19:227-231.
  • Reiter, M.S. 2013. Cotton Fertility. In: Herbert et al. (eds.). Virginia Cotton Production Guide. College of Agriculture and Life Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. p. 1-4.
  • Ritchey, K.D., D.M.G. Sousa, E. Lobato, and O. Correa. 1980. Calcium Leaching to Increase Rooting Depth in a Brazilian Savannah Oxisol. Agron. J. 72:40-44.
  • Sako, H., J.E. Soares, L.A. Silva, and R. Balardin. 2015. Relações de enraizamento e cálcio no solo para alta produtividade da safra 15/16. Sorocaba: CESB - Comitê Estratégico Soja Brasil, 2015. 15 p. (Boletim Técnico 1).
  • Satisha, G.C., and A.N. Ganeshamurthy. 2016. Bioefficacy of Polyhalite Application on Yield and Quality of Cabbage and Cauliflower. IPI e-ifc 44:3-13.
  • SIACESP, Union of Fertilizers and Correctives Industry from Sao Paulo State. 2015. Brazil - Imports of fertilizers and raw materials for fertilizers. Available at http://www.siacesp.com.br/pdf/fornecedores.pdf. Access in: 29/11/2016.
  • Silva, E.B., F.D. Nogueira, P.T.G. Guimarães, S.J.R. Chagas, and L. Costa. 1999. Sources and Rates of Potash in the Yield and Quality of Coffee Grains. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 34:335-345.
  • Scherer, H.W. 2001. Sulphur in Crop Production - invited paper. Eur. J. Agron. 14:81-111.
  • Tiwari, D.D., S.B. Pandey, and N.K. Katiyar. 2015. Effects of Polyhalite as a Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of the Oilseed Crops Mustard and Sesame. IPI e-ifc 42:13-20.
  • Tam, H.M., D.M. Manh, T.T. Thuan, H.H. Cuong, and P.V. Bao. 2016. Agronomic Efficiency of Polyhalite Application on Peanut Yield and Quality in Vietnam. IPI e-ifc 47:3-11.
  • Vale, F. 2010. Use of Potassium and Magnesium Sulphate and Effects in the Yield and Quality of Orange Fruits. In: Reunião Braileira de Fertilidade do Solo e Nutrição de Plantas - Fertbio. 2010. Guarapari, ES: Incaper. CD-ROM.
  • Vale, F. 2016. Calcium and Magnesium Movement in Soil Profile with Polyhalite as Potash Fertilizer for Soybean Crop. In: Reunião Braileira de Fertilidade do Solo e Nutrição de Plantas - Fertbio. 2016. Goiania, GO: UFG.
  • Vale, F., and R.A. Silva. 2009. Replacement of Potash Chloride by Potassium and Magnesium Sulphate and Effects in the Yield and Quality of Potatoes. Congresso Brasileiro de Ciencia do Solo, 32. 2009. Fortaleza, CE: UFC. CD-ROM.
  • Vitti, G.C. 1989. Sulfur in Soil. In: Bull, L.T. and C.A. Rosolem, (eds). Interpretação de análise química de solo e planta para fins de adubação. Botucatu: Fundação de Estudos e Pesquisas Agrícolas e Florestais, 1989. p. 129-175.
  • Vitti, G.C., and F. Vale. 2013. Evaluation of Agronomic Effectiveness of Fertilizer Polyhalite as Sulfur, Calcium, Magnesium and Potassium Sources to Rice Crop in Greenhouse. FEALQ/ESALQ, Piracicaba. 15 p. 2013 (Report to ICL Fertilizers Company).
  • Vitti, G.C., R. Otto, and J. Savieto. 2015. Management of Sulfur in Agriculture. Informacoes Agronomicas, Piracicaba, n. 152, December 2015. p. 1-14.
  • Zehler, E., H. Kreipe, and P.A. Gething. 1981. Potassium Sulfate and Potassium Chloride: Their Influence on the Yield and Quality of Cultivated Plants. International Potash Institute, Switzerland. 111 p.
  • Zhao, F.J., M.J. Hawkesford, and S.P. McGrath. 1999. Sulphur Assimilation and Effects on Yield and Quality of Wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 30:1-17.
  • Zörb, C., M. Senbayram, and E. Peiter. 2014. Potassium in Agriculture - Status and Perspectives. J. Plant Physiol.171:656-669.
En su idioma

Choose your Crop

Choose your App
IPI research e-ifc app for iPad and iPhone available now from the Apple App Store
IPI Research App for Android and Apple phones and tablets.

Infographics
The Role of Potassium (K) in the Plant (in Urdu)
Potassium and Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) in Urdu
Potassium in Soil and Plant Systems (in Urdu)
IPI profile infographic
Chloride - an essential nutrient
Potassium and Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE)
Managing Water and Fertilizer for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification - infographic
Potassium Improves your Crop Quality
Potassium Improves your Health
Potassium in Soil and Plant Systems
The Role of Potassium (K) in the Plant
What does a Plant Need to Live
Assessment of the Impact of Targeted Use of Fertilizer on Irrigated Rice in Asia
The Role of Potassium (K) in the Plant (in Urdu)

New publication