- Contents - e-ifc No. 27
- Research Findings
- The Potato Crop in Bihar: Status and Future Challenges
- The Effects of Soil Test Based Potassium Application and Manures on Yield and Quality of Sugarcane Grown on a Typical Calcareous Soil of Bangladesh
- Variable-Rate Application (VRA) of Potassium Fertilization for Soybean in Brazil
- State-Level symposium on potassium to summarize a project titled 'Yield and Quality Studies of Rabi Onion as Influenced by Graded Levels of Potash in Inceptisols'
- Role of Potassium in Sustaining the Yield and its Quality
- Management of Potassium in Plant and Soil Systems in China
- Other Events
- K in the Literature
If you wish to subscribe to the e-ifc please visit the subscription page.
Variable-Rate Application (VRA) of Potassium Fertilization for Soybean in Brazil
Bernardi, A.C.C.(1)(2), L.M. Gimenez(3), and P.L.O.A. Machado(4)
print version pdf 919 kB
(1)Corresponding author: email@example.com.
(2)Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, C.P.339, CEP: 13560-970, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
(3)CSEM Brasil, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
(4)Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, Santo Antônio de Goiás, GO, Brazil.
Potassium (K) and phosphorus (P) are the two most common nutrient inputs in the cultivation of soybean crop on the highly weathered, low-fertile and acid soils of tropical Brazil. Supplying adequate K is essential to maintain high quality and profitable yields (Tanaka et al., 1993). Not only does soybean have a high K requirement for growth but large amounts of K are also removed from the field when harvesting high-yielding soybean crops (Mascarenhas et al., 1981).
Soybean yield variation within a given area is very common as agricultural fields are managed as uniform units. Previous results from Bernardi et al. (2002) in a no-till farm in southern Brazil illustrated this variation within a commercial soybean crop, where yields ranged from 1,800 to 5,300 kg ha-1 over the same area that had been managed uniformly (Fig. 1). This evidence of spatial variation of yield must be regarded as a function of textural differences of the soil, as reported in a study of the same plot by Machado et al. (2006). In this work the authors examined spatial variability of soil clay content at 0-20 cm depth. Average clay contents ranged from 612 to 667 g kg-1 in Zone A, and from 362 to 442 g kg-1 in Zone B which, according to Luchiari et al. (2000) and Machado et al. (2006), established the limits of the two management zones in this study (Fig. 2). The authors also related soil electric conductivity (EC) with soil clay content, and showed that an EC map adequately reflected the spatial variation in soil texture of the two management zones.
Study of the VRA of K
With the objective of detailing the spatial variability observed in this area, Machado et al. (2002) and Bernardi et al. (2002) studied how soil parameters and plant nutrient concentrations also varied within the commercial area. The average content of K determined by Machado et al. (2002) at the 0-5, 5-10, and 10-20 cm depth were considered medium to high (Fig. 3). Thus, the original existing exchangeable K levels in the soil were probably sufficient to meet the nutritional requirements of the crop.
click to enlarge
Nevertheless, foliar diagnosis highlighted many regions with K levels below the adequate range for soybean (17 to 25 g kg-1) under southern Brazilian growth conditions (Sfredo et al., 1986; Fig. 4). These workers identified K as one of the main potential constraints to soybean yield. Their findings also indicated that soil fertility management has to take spatial variation within fields into account, not only because of a direct affect on crop yield but also for accurate protection of the environment. This is because the uniform application of fertilizers and lime in areas with spatial variation in soil properties could result in points of fertilizer application above or below the required doses. The alternative, or control of the observed variability, could be a variable rate application (VRA) of nutrient supply.
click to enlarge
Bongiovanni and Lowenberg-Deboer (2004), in an extensive literature review confirmed that VRA can contribute to maintaining agricultural sustainability by applying fertilizer only at locations where and when the need arises. The benefit of precision agriculture in this application is the usage of detailed data point (e.g. soil analysis) mapping which reduces losses caused by excessive application of fertilizers. A major weakness identified by the authors was that few studies actually measured levels of environmental impact or used sensors, and most of the estimated environmental benefits were indirect, i.e. measuring the reduced use of inputs.
Since VRA of fertilizer has the potential to improve nutrient use efficiency, improve economic returns, and reduce negative environmental impacts (in the case of N and P fertilizers), Bernardi et al. (2010) evaluated the VRA of K fertilizer to the soybean crop in a no-till system. The study was conducted on a 13 ha soybean grain field in Carambeí, State of Paraná, Brazil in a Typic Hapludox. The area has been under notillage for more than 10 years, growing grains (soybean, wheat and maize) in rotation with a cover crop (oats). Four treatments were used: control, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha-1 of K2O applied as KCl at the V2 growth stage of soybean. Narrow strip plots of 18 x 1,000 m (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6) were assigned to three blocks within the field. In each strip, plot grain yield was continuously evaluated at harvest time with a combine equipped with yield monitoring and a real-time global positioning system (GPS) unit without differential correction. Data storage in a geographical information system (GIS) was used to fit the kriged yield map.
click to enlarge
Yield results (Bernardi et al., 2010) are presented in Fig. 6, which illustrate the levels of K fertilizer as a function of distance from the plot and the kriged map of soybean yield. Soybean average yield was 3,838 kg ha-1, and spatial differences in yield were observed with grain yields ranging from 2,100 to 6,583 kg ha-1. These differences occurred where Machado et al. (2006) had shown soil texture variation. The results indicated no response to K fertilizer application at the tested doses.
These results confirm the findings of previous studies in which there were increases in soybean yield, even in soils with low levels of exchangeable K over successive crops (Mascarenhas et al. 1981; Palhano et al., 1983; Rosolem et al., 1988; Borkert et al., 1997a; Borkert et al., 1997b). From these findings, Rosolem et al. (1988) concluded that in addition to exchangeable K, there are other forms of K in the soil that can be released during the crop cycle, including non-exchangeable K.
According to Bernardi et al. (2010), an alternative for the producer would be to apply fertilizer in amounts to restore nutrients exported at harvest. In this respect, harvesting one tonne of soybean removes 18.7 kg K (Tanaka et al., 1993), or 22.5 kg of K2O from the soil. The results given in Fig. 7, showing exportation of K by soybean grains, have to be considered in relation to these values. If the amount of K removed at harvest was not properly restored, some K mining would be expected to occur. The balance of K fertilization (K2O applied - K2O exported) indicates that a positive balance can only be achieved by supplying 80 to 120 kg of K2O ha-1. The average fertilization (80 kg K2O ha-1) used by the producer in this area could still lead to a small deficit of K supply. These findings are also in agreement with those reported by Bongiovanni and Lowenberg-Deboer (2004), that VRA of K improved fertilizer distribution.
click to enlarge
These results showed that the recommended map for variable rate of K fertilization can be accomplished by using yield maps from previous years. With this information, VRA of K for this plot could be performed, and used to reduce yield variability and maintain profitability while optimizing K applications.
- Bernardi, A.C.C., L.M. Gimenez, C.A. Silva, P.L.O.A. Machado. 2010. Variable Rate Application of Potassium Fertilizer for Soybean Crop Growth in a No-Till System. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Denver, 2010. http://www.icpaonline.org/finalpdf/abstract_138.pdf.
- Bernardi, A.C.C., P.L.O.A. Machado, C.A.F.S. Carmo, C.A. Silva, L.I. Ortiz Valencia, C. Bettini, M.S.P. Meirelles, and J.P. Molin. 2002. Georeferenced Soybean Yield and Nutritional Status Evaluation under No-Till System in Southern Brazil p. 62-70. In: P.C. Robert (ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Minneapolis, 2002. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
- Bongiovanni, R., and J. Lowenberg-Deboer. 2004. Precision Agriculture and Sustainability. Prec. Agric. 5:359-387.
- Borkert, C.M., J.R.B. Farias, G.J. Sfredo, F. Tutida, and C.L. Spoladori. Soybean Response to Fertilization and the Availability of Potassium in a Latossolo Roxo Eutrófico. (In Portuguese, with English abstract). Pesq. Agrop. Bras. 32:1009-1022.
- Borkert, C.M., J.R.B. Farias, G.J. Sfredo, F. Tutida, and C.L. Spoladori. 1997a. Soybean Response to Fertilization and the Availability of Potassium in a Latossolo Roxo Álico. (In Portuguese, with English abstract). Pesq. Agrop. Bras. 32:1119-1129.
- Luchiari, A., J. Shanahan, D. Francis, M. Schlemmer, J. Schepers, M. Liebig, A. Schepers, and S. Payton. 2000. Strategies for Establishing Management Zones for Site-Specific Nutrient Management. In: P.C. Robert et al. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Precision Agriculture and Other Resource Management. Bloomington, MN. 16–19 July 2000. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
- Machado, P.L.O.A., A.C.C. Bernardi, L.I.O. Valencia, J.P. Molin, L.M. Gimenez, C.A. Silva, A.G.A. Andrade, B.E. Madari, and M.S.P.M. Meirelles. 2006. Electrical Conductivity Mapping in Relation to Clay of a Ferralsol under No Tillage System. (In Portuguese, with English abstract). Pesq. Agrop. Bras. 41:1023-1031.
- Machado, P.L.O.A., A.C.C. Bernardi, C.A. Silva, L.I. Ortiz Valencia, C. Bettini. 2002. Variability of Fertility Parameters of a Typic Hapludox and Estimation of Liming and Fertilizer Requirements for Soybean p. 111-113. In: P.C. Robert (ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Minneapolis, 2002. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
- Mascarenhas, H.A.A., J.M.A.S. Valadares, C.L. Rotta, and E.A. Bulisani. 1981. Potassium Fertilizer in Soybean Production, Content of Potassium in the Leaves and the Availability of Potassium in Latossolo Roxo of Cerrado. (In Portuguese, with English abstract). Bragantia 40:125-134.
- Palhano, J.P., O. Muzilli, K. Igue, A. Garcia and G.J. Sfredo. 1983. Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilization of Soybean in Paraná State. (In Portuguese, with English abstract). Pesq. Agrop. Bras. 18:357-362.
- Rosolem, C.A., J.R. Machado, and D.B.O. Ribeiro. 1988. Forms of Potassium in the Soil and Potassium Nutrition of Soybean (In Portuguese, with English abstract). R. Bras Ci Solo 12:121-125.
- Sfredo, G.J., A.F. Lantmann, R.J. Campo, C.M. Borkert. 1986. Soja, nutrição mineral, adubação e calagem. Londrina: EMBRAPA-CNPSo. 21 p. EMBRAPA-CNPSo, Documentos, 64.
- Tanaka, R.T., H.A.A. Mascarenhas, and C.M. Borkert. 1993. Nutrição mineral da soja. p. 105-135. (In Portuguese). In: Arantes, N.E., P.I.M. Souza (ed.) Cultura da soja nos cerrados. POTAFOS, Piracicaba, Brazil.
- Choose your App